Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Some argue that drones strikes help prevent “boots on the ground” combat and makes America safer, that the strikes are legal under American and international law, and that they are carried out with the support of Americans and foreign governments, while others argue that drone strikes kill civilians, creating more terrorists than they kill and sowing animosity in foreign countries, that the strikes are extrajudicial and illegal, and create a dangerous disconnect between the horrors of war and soldiers carrying out the strikes.
Senior White House Official Confirms Drone Strikes, Discusses U.S. Targeting Principles and Practices, American Journal of International Law
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Unmanned combat aerial vehicle - Wikipedia
Pro and Con: International Drone Strikes
Houthis launch sea drone to attack ships hours after US, allies issue final warning –
European assistance to deadly US drone strikes, by Amnesty International USA
Public views drone strikes with other countries' support as most legitimate
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles & AI: Policy measures & challenges
Seven (Initial) Drone Warfare Lessons from Ukraine - Modern War Institute
